COLLEGE SEXUAL ASSAULT PROGRAMS THAT HAVE BEEN. COLLEGE SEXUAL ASSAULT PROGRAMS THAT HAVE BEEN EVALUATED. Similar to other relationship violence intervention/ prevention programs (e.g., dating violence), college sexual.Prevention and Intervention of Teen Dating Violence. During the preteen and teen years, young people are learning the skills they need to form positive, healthy relationships with others. This is an ideal time to promote healthy relationships and prevent patterns of relationship violence that can last into adulthood. Most programs focus on changing knowledge, attitudes and behaviors linked with dating violence while focusing on the skills needed to build healthy relationships. Effective School Level Interventions. In one rigorous NIJ- funded study, school- level interventions in 3. Police-reported dating violence in Canada, 2008. Dating violence involving female victims more likely to lead to charges. Dating Violence Background Dating violence occurs when one partner attempts to maintain power and control over the other through one or more forms of abuse, including sexual, physical, verbal and emotional abuse. 3 CREATING AN INSTITUTIONAL DATING ABUSE PREVENTION PROGRAM As part of a comprehensive approach to health and safety, Love Is Not Abuse can be a springboard to starting dating abuse prevention programs. Dating and Domestic Violence on College Campuses. This article has been archived. It is still available for reference purposes, but may contain out of date information. 32% experienced dating violence by a pervious partner. Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2010 Latino Teens at Risk: The Effectiveness of Dating Violence Prevention Programs Ruth N. Calvillo Claremont McKenna College This Open. Dating violence can happen to any teen regardless of gender, race, socio-economic status, or whether or not they have experience with dating. Rutgers-Violence Prevention and Victim Assistance. Facts about Dating/Domestic Violence. Dating violence among college students: key issues for college counselors. New York City public middle schools reduced dating violence by up to 5. Classroom- level interventions were delivered in six sessions, using a curriculum emphasizing the consequences for perpetrators, state laws and penalties, the construction of gender roles, and healthy relationships. School- level interventions included the use of temporary school- based restraining orders, higher levels of faculty and security presence in . Researchers found that, compared with the control group who received no intervention, students who received the school- level intervention or both the school- and classroom- level interventions experienced reduced levels of dating violence and sexual harassment. The researchers noted that the classroom- level intervention alone was not effective in improving these outcomes. In addition, students in the school- level intervention were more likely to intend to intervene as bystanders if they witnessed abusive behavior between their peers. These findings are important in several ways: This is one of the first studies to document the effectiveness of such prevention programs among middle school students. Given the large size of the study (with more than 2,5. The success of the school- level intervention is particularly important because it can be implemented with very few extra costs to schools. See the curriculum evaluated in this study, Shifting Boundaries: Lessons on Relationships for Students in Middle School (pdf, 6. Family- Based Interventions for High- Risk Youth. Youth exposed to domestic violence are at increased risk to be both a victim and perpetrator of dating violence. To help fill the gap, NIJ funded an effort to adapt the successes of an existing evidence- based program, Families for Safe Dates, so it would be applicable to teens who are exposed to domestic violence. To adapt Families for Safe Dates for teens exposed to domestic violence, the researcher recruited 2. To be eligible, women had to have been victims of domestic violence but no longer living with their partners and to have a child 1. The researchers adjusted the protocol recruitment strategies, data collection procedures, measures, and program administration, and eliminated the follow- up calls from the health educator. They also determined that the intervention was reaching the high- risk group: teens who had been exposed to an average of seven years of domestic violence and had high rates of dating violence compared with national averages. These teens also had high rates of exposure to bullying, sexual harassment and peer aggression, as both victims and perpetrators. Overall, the mothers and youth reported that they enjoyed the booklets and found them helpful and informative. Given low rates of booklet completion and follow- up, however, the researchers could not decisively determine what effects the booklet had. The pilot study was instrumental in guiding the development, refinement and implementation of a larger, ongoing efficacy trial of the intervention that is being funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Read the final technical report Dating Abuse Prevention in Teens of Moms with Domestic Violence Protection Orders (pdf, 4. Learn more about the. CDC's Randomized Efficacy Trial of Moms and Teens for Safe Dates. Group- Based Interventions for High- Risk Youth. Adolescents who are maltreated and become involved in the child welfare system are at risk for being revictimized by romantic partners. The study focused on girls because they sometimes face more serious consequences of dating violence (e. The girls were assigned randomly to receive one of two curriculums: A group of 6. A group of 6. 7 girls participated in a risk detection/executive functioning curriculum designed to improve their ability to recognize and maintain attention to environmental danger cues, recognize different emotions and know how to respond in risky relational situations. A third group of 4. Overall, the girls reported positive experiences about participating in a curriculum. The study found no significant differences in revictimization rates for girls who completed the social learning/feminist curriculum compared with those who completed the risk detection/executive functioning curriculum. In addition, compared with girls who did not participate in a curriculum, the odds of not being revictimized (sexually or physically) were two to five times greater for girls who received the risk detection/executive functioning or social learning curriculum. The study suggests that high- risk girls can successfully participate in and benefit from relational programming. Read an abstract and access the final report. Preventing Revictimization in Teen Dating Relationships. Stein, Dan Woods, and Elizabeth Mumford. Shifting Boundaries: Final Report on an Experimental Evaluation of a Youth Dating Violence Prevention Program in New York City Middle Schools (pdf, 3. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, grant number 2. MU- MU- 0. 01. 0, October 2. NCJ 2. 36. 17. 5. Mc. Keown, Maureen Sanderson, Keith E.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |